Learn To Photograph Trees

I actually have no idea.
I like trees. A
lot. Some of my favorite objects in the real world are
trees. Think I can reliably take a good photograph of a
tree? No way.
Why is it hard?
Humans know what trees should look like.
They generally have a
strong 3D presence but are actually quite similar to each other and
parts of themselves. If you take any random snapshot of tree, you
generally get something unrecognizable as tree or something that is
generic and powerless.

Take this example. There are 4 trees. They are
different ages (and so
different width trunks). The lighting is good (as good as you
generally get in forest - side lit, orange). Which tree is
closest? Do you get a sense of scale? Majesty? These
are big trees - do you feel dwarfed?
This fails the self similar problem (big trunks far away look the same
as smaller trunks closer up).

How about this example? Trees are complex
with internal shadowing. They are large (mostly bigger than people). At
the time, this was a powerful scene, but I have done nothing to convey
that to you.
Was there something I could have done to save
these shots? Is
there some f-stop on a camera that does a fantastic job? I
haven't found it. Below are some of the pictures of trees I have
taken that I like. This covers less than 2% of the photographic
situations I've been in where I wanted to take a picture of a tree.
Individual Trees
Strategy
1: Separate Tree From Background
It's a rare opportunity, but if you can separate
the tree from the
other trees you might have an honest chance at getting a good
picture. Almost never works in dense west coast forests.


When you see that classic photo of a lone tree on the horizon of
rolling fields they are using this technique (and a long lens).
It works - it's classic.
Palm trees seem to be a good special case of this rule. Most
people
know what the top looks like and it separates well from the rest of the
tree. Go to the tropics, shoot lots, it's one of the few places
that trees are easy to shoot.
Sadly, half measures don't work well here. How about this shot?

These rare oak trees really stand out and this
tree was by it's
self. There is an interesting foreground element and they sky and
near background don't suck. Sadly, the shape of tree is confused
with the background and the effect is lost. Try harder.
Strategy
2: Put a Human in there
Just adding a human isn't enough - you need to
have a human and some way to
separate the tree from everything else. If you are
extraordinarily
lucky, a tree can be lit (add a human) an voila - a passable picture.



Forests
Even more trouble. That self similar thing
makes your life miserable. There are two formulas - either the
dappled light clearing or the hazy view.
Strategy
1: The Dappled Light Clearing
The formula is easy to follow: Wide angle (often the wider the
better) with a rare
clearing in the forest with dappled light falling on the ground.
The dappled light allows you to figure out the scale of the forest
floor and with that, you get a sense of camera angle and depth.
Once your eye understand the perspective, it is willing to construct
the trees from what it knows. Missing the clearing or the
dappled light? Don't bother taking the photo.


What you are looking for is the ground to provide enough detail for
your brain to grab scale, enough differences in lighting for your brain
to reconstruct depth and finally enough to make it interesting.
Strategy
2: Atmospheric Depth Queuing

Again, trying to get over the
self similar problem. If the atmosphere provide depth
queuing (the further back it is, the thicker the fog/haze/smoke) the
observer can reconstruct the 3D scene, you have a
picture that conveys the space and trees. The problem is getting
that depth
queuing medium inside of forest. One can't go around setting
forests on
fire in order to take photos of them.
Got it? Let me know if you find another strategy.
John Harvey Photo > Learn Photography > Learn To Photograph Trees
Hey--found your site weeks ago and bookmarked it, and just had a chance this aft. to look over it. Great photos AND easy-to navigate site design.
Thanks for the photo-tips,
Dave
great site, few days ago i bought a camera and very confused, now i am very enthusiastic to experiment with the help of tips given in your site.
Prabhakar Rao
Tuesday, February 19th, 2008 at 03:48:01
thank you, i needed to do a report on photography for my photography class im taking in high school and you gave me everything i needed:]
and the pictures were gorgeous. i have such an interest in it. its truly a beautiful work of art
Briianna
Monday, March 3rd, 2008 at 18:30:47
Thanks for the forest tips! I'm heading up to the Muir Woods soon, and will definitely apply them...
Gordon
Monday, March 24th, 2008 at 10:19:32
This was incredibly helpful! Thanks so much for sharing your knowledge with photo examples !
Patty
Wednesday, April 2nd, 2008 at 15:28:31
Last Modified Tuesday, January 1st, 2008 at 22:38:27 Edit
Copyright and Contact Information.